inherit
100824
0
May 13, 2012 5:37:49 GMT -8
Michael
14,585
March 2007
wrighty
|
Post by Michael on Oct 21, 2009 18:57:06 GMT -8
As many of you may know, some of the HTML5 items have started to be supported in some browsers. Google have taken the next step by changing some of their coding to match into the new HTML 5 coding. In HTML5, the doctype declaration has changed to: <!doctype html>If you view source Google, then you will see that they have indeed adopted this new declaration. Is this the start of a transition to HTML 5?  |
|
inherit
97216
0
May 14, 2024 16:15:30 GMT -8
Bennett 🚀
Formerly iPokemon.
3,622
January 2007
catattack
iPokemon's Mini-Profile
|
Post by Bennett 🚀 on Oct 21, 2009 19:02:22 GMT -8
Most likely.. so the <!doctype html> is like a censor? lol, for the original Doctype declaration?
|
|
inherit
100824
0
May 13, 2012 5:37:49 GMT -8
Michael
14,585
March 2007
wrighty
|
Post by Michael on Oct 21, 2009 19:05:44 GMT -8
Not a censor, it's a change in standards for HTML5. If you're running your page with HTML5 compliant coding then you should use the new doctype. |
|
inherit
97216
0
May 14, 2024 16:15:30 GMT -8
Bennett 🚀
Formerly iPokemon.
3,622
January 2007
catattack
iPokemon's Mini-Profile
|
Post by Bennett 🚀 on Oct 21, 2009 19:18:19 GMT -8
Have you seen anything else new? Like different than the standard?
|
|
inherit
100824
0
May 13, 2012 5:37:49 GMT -8
Michael
14,585
March 2007
wrighty
|
Post by Michael on Oct 21, 2009 19:30:07 GMT -8
What do you mean? |
|
inherit
130228
GamingMedley charles.stover 0
Nov 18, 2012 0:12:30 GMT -8
Charles Stover
PM me for Arcade or ShoutBox support
1,731
August 2008
gamechief
|
Post by Charles Stover on Oct 21, 2009 20:58:42 GMT -8
Oh, God, I can't say how happy the new Doctype declaration makes me. The old Doctype standards were atrocious. Whoever thought they were a good idea was on something.
Not that I can see why the Doctype is even still existant. It doesn't tell anything that <html> doesn't, and in the most extreme scenario, you could just append to <html> with an attribute.
But, I'm sure there are reasons.
|
|
inherit
100824
0
May 13, 2012 5:37:49 GMT -8
Michael
14,585
March 2007
wrighty
|
Post by Michael on Oct 21, 2009 21:35:16 GMT -8
Oh, God, I can't say how happy the new Doctype declaration makes me. The old Doctype standards were atrocious. Whoever thought they were a good idea was on something. Not that I can see why the Doctype is even still existant. It doesn't tell anything that <html> doesn't, and in the most extreme scenario, you could just append to <html> with an attribute. But, I'm sure there are reasons. Finally a declaration that we can remember? |
|
inherit
16846
0
Nov 19, 2012 15:20:20 GMT -8
Chris
3,036
December 2003
cddude
|
Post by Chris on Oct 22, 2009 10:33:54 GMT -8
<3 short declarations. HTML5 is a welcome new set of standards to me.  Brings a lot of fun toys out. I'm not the least bit surprised that Google was one of the first major entities to adopt HTML5. |
|
inherit
Official Code helper
60405
0
Feb 18, 2012 23:45:36 GMT -8
(¯`•DregondRahl•._)
Set~[Me]~Free
6,637
October 2005
dregondrahl
|
Post by (¯`•DregondRahl•._) on Oct 24, 2009 0:28:57 GMT -8
HTML5 is going to be awesome one all the browsers support it properly, Coded some random stuff using HTML5 a few days ago, seems quite lovely to use. ^^
|
|
inherit
100824
0
May 13, 2012 5:37:49 GMT -8
Michael
14,585
March 2007
wrighty
|
Post by Michael on Oct 24, 2009 9:32:38 GMT -8
HTML5 is going to be awesome one all the browsers support it properly, Coded some random stuff using HTML5 a few days ago, seems quite lovely to use. ^^ Care to share it? |
|
Brings a lot of fun toys out. I'm not the least bit surprised that Google was one of the first major entities to adopt HTML5.
