inherit
26723
0
Dec 13, 2005 21:11:22 GMT -8
RetsamDiortem
"He treats objects like women man!"
3,109
June 2004
metroidmaster
|
Post by RetsamDiortem on Jun 26, 2005 23:38:20 GMT -8
Ok that's all fine and dandy that you posted something like this on GFAQs but will this really do a thing? I highly doubt it.
|
|
inherit
12045
0
Nov 19, 2012 14:52:05 GMT -8
Renegade
As unique as mice pudding milkshake
40,557
August 2003
renegade
|
Post by Renegade on Jun 27, 2005 4:02:25 GMT -8
Two quick points: I don't think you're right there. Threads generally aren't locked just for someone going off topic, and offtopic is not neccessarily spam. Spam here is usually considererd to be useless threads or posts, or advertising (ie "join mi baord"). Again, you're using an incorrect idea of spam. When you're told "Do not reply to spam threads", that refers to when someone posts something that's clearly against the rules, such as when Noobiewoobie posted 100 blank threads one day.
|
|
inherit
22979
0
Mar 15, 2018 14:02:42 GMT -8
P!nk4eva
You Will See
3,022
April 2004
pink4eva
|
Post by P!nk4eva on Jun 27, 2005 4:54:49 GMT -8
Sounds good.
I dont see why making a Gmail thread is a rule breaker, its just a topic, it will be like making a rule on making threads on Voting etc.
|
|
inherit
26723
0
Dec 13, 2005 21:11:22 GMT -8
RetsamDiortem
"He treats objects like women man!"
3,109
June 2004
metroidmaster
|
Post by RetsamDiortem on Jun 27, 2005 15:09:23 GMT -8
Sounds good. I dont see why making a Gmail thread is a rule breaker, its just a topic, it will be like making a rule on making threads on Voting etc. Back when Gmail was new, GT was spammed up with Gmail topics.
|
|