Former Member
inherit
guest@proboards.com
266877
0
Nov 22, 2024 8:28:26 GMT -8
Former Member
0
January 1970
Former Member
|
Post by Former Member on Aug 21, 2023 8:08:06 GMT -8
This is not really appropriate here, y'all. Ken - While the content warning is appreciated and made with the best of intentions, it's generally best to side step some ... subjective opinions about what constitutes as objectionable content. Aside from blatant NSFW (or rules permitting it) and blatantly illegal content, the TOS department is the one that should handle defining these things. This is not the place to challenge someone on the definition of a term, even if your intentions are honourable lucylacemaker - If you disagree with someone's assessment of your forum, that's okay. But take the assessment in the friendly spirit it was offered, and just kind of let criticisms that don't jive with your opinion go. Ultimately you are the vision holder for your forum, and if you disagree with someone's assessment that is your prerogative I understand. He is just as entitled to have an opinion as I am. I took down the mention of NSFW and will abide by the tos. My intention was freedom of speech. If someone left wing wanted to join I would let them. 🙂
|
|
Kami
Forum Cat
Posts: 40,198
Mini-Profile Theme: Kami's Mini-Profile
#f35f71
156500
0
Offline
Jul 24, 2021 11:48:29 GMT -8
Kami
40,198
July 2010
kamiyakaoru
Kami's Mini-Profile
|
Post by Kami on Aug 21, 2023 8:37:22 GMT -8
This is not really appropriate here, y'all. Ken - While the content warning is appreciated and made with the best of intentions, it's generally best to side step some ... subjective opinions about what constitutes as objectionable content. Aside from blatant NSFW (or rules permitting it) and blatantly illegal content, the TOS department is the one that should handle defining these things. This is not the place to challenge someone on the definition of a term, even if your intentions are honourable lucylacemaker - If you disagree with someone's assessment of your forum, that's okay. But take the assessment in the friendly spirit it was offered, and just kind of let criticisms that don't jive with your opinion go. Ultimately you are the vision holder for your forum, and if you disagree with someone's assessment that is your prerogative I understand. He is just as entitled to have an opinion as I am. I took down the mention of NSFW and will abide by the tos. My intention was freedom of speech. If someone left wing wanted to join I would let them. 🙂 Freedom of speech is great! But a gentle reminder that refers to the government interfering with your ability to speak your truth or criticise them, but does not apply to privately owned entities such as ProBoards, who are able to limit the speech they allow on their platform. No accusations here, just a gentle reminder :) As long as you follow the TOS, you should be good!
|
|