inherit
104727
0
Sept 2, 2008 19:57:53 GMT -8
Trix
2,490
May 2007
larryjames
|
Post by Trix on May 26, 2007 17:23:12 GMT -8
Alright so I haven't played the 1st one in well ages but the second one looks incredible! It's a computer game made by Blizzard based off the first Starcraft PC game. For more check it out www.starcraft2.com/
|
|
inuyasharp
inherit
-1634624
0
Apr 28, 2024 19:44:03 GMT -8
inuyasharp
0
January 1970
GUEST
|
Post by inuyasharp on May 26, 2007 17:25:54 GMT -8
Never heard of it. Looks good.
|
|
tortuga
inherit
-1634625
0
Apr 28, 2024 19:44:03 GMT -8
tortuga
0
January 1970
GUEST
|
Post by tortuga on May 26, 2007 17:35:14 GMT -8
|
|
inuyasharp
inherit
-1634626
0
Apr 28, 2024 19:44:03 GMT -8
inuyasharp
0
January 1970
GUEST
|
Post by inuyasharp on May 26, 2007 17:40:22 GMT -8
|
|
inherit
33459
0
Sept 17, 2023 9:22:13 GMT -8
Alnarra
You're a kitty
8,111
November 2004
fullphaser
|
Post by Alnarra on May 26, 2007 17:54:55 GMT -8
Hope the boys at blizzard know this time they have some competition on the field... and it won't just be C&C. They are going to have to be 10x more innovative than what they have shown so far to even be worth buying.
|
|
inherit
40725
0
Aug 10, 2023 6:22:46 GMT -8
Gus Gus the Great
Who is John Galt?
2,225
April 2005
shanara
|
Post by Gus Gus the Great on May 26, 2007 18:17:37 GMT -8
Hmm... I hope it's better than the first one, despite how good the first one was. It just seemed too...simplistic. I've played better real-time stragegy games. This one should be awesomeness though.
|
|
inherit
1453
0
Nov 19, 2012 12:33:36 GMT -8
kasooi
▒█▐ Rawr ▌█▒
8,242
September 2001
kasooi
|
Post by kasooi on May 26, 2007 18:31:09 GMT -8
Hope the boys at blizzard know this time they have some competition on the field... and it won't just be C&C. They are going to have to be 10x more innovative than what they have shown so far to even be worth buying. Blizzard doesn't have to do anything. Their name sells more than their games do. World of Warcraft was expected to do horribly and game companies like EA wanted to completely stay out of the MMO business due to other MMO's not gaining enough money. But WoW sold mostly just due to it being created by Blizzard. People love their games no matter what
|
|
inherit
33459
0
Sept 17, 2023 9:22:13 GMT -8
Alnarra
You're a kitty
8,111
November 2004
fullphaser
|
Post by Alnarra on May 26, 2007 20:28:52 GMT -8
Hope the boys at blizzard know this time they have some competition on the field... and it won't just be C&C. They are going to have to be 10x more innovative than what they have shown so far to even be worth buying. Blizzard doesn't have to do anything. Their name sells more than their games do. World of Warcraft was expected to do horribly and game companies like EA wanted to completely stay out of the MMO business due to other MMO's not gaining enough money. But WoW sold mostly just due to it being created by Blizzard. People love their games no matter what Oh I imagine it will sell by the bundle load becuase this one horse show is making another game. But I don't expect it to be the ground breaking game that was the original, nor do I think it will be all that impressive
|
|
inherit
17836
0
Apr 22, 2024 12:33:10 GMT -8
daniel
27,203
December 2003
danielsmith
|
Post by daniel on May 26, 2007 20:57:54 GMT -8
Oh I imagine it will sell by the bundle load becuase this one horse show is making another game. But I don't expect it to be the ground breaking game that was the original, nor do I think it will be all that impressive Shush you. *crosses fingers in hopes that it's as good as the original... updates avatar...
|
|
inherit
33459
0
Sept 17, 2023 9:22:13 GMT -8
Alnarra
You're a kitty
8,111
November 2004
fullphaser
|
Post by Alnarra on May 26, 2007 21:13:08 GMT -8
Oh I imagine it will sell by the bundle load becuase this one horse show is making another game. But I don't expect it to be the ground breaking game that was the original, nor do I think it will be all that impressive Shush you. *crosses fingers in hopes that it's as good as the original... updates avatar... My life for Auir but seriously, For the true Golden Throne, one must pick of Dawn of War
|
|
inherit
29252
0
Sept 6, 2012 15:46:49 GMT -8
Derek‽
28,655
August 2004
kajiaisu
|
Post by Derek‽ on May 26, 2007 21:32:25 GMT -8
One word: Weak
Sure, the promotional videos and pictures look great. However, the gameplay videos look boring and cliche. It brings absolutely nothing to the genre. Granted, it does look better than other games of its genre, but not good enough for me to bothing taking a second look.
|
|
inherit
33459
0
Sept 17, 2023 9:22:13 GMT -8
Alnarra
You're a kitty
8,111
November 2004
fullphaser
|
Post by Alnarra on May 26, 2007 21:44:20 GMT -8
One word: Weak Sure, the promotional videos and pictures look great. However, the gameplay videos look boring and cliche. It brings absolutely nothing to the genre. Granted, it does look better than other games of its genre, but not good enough for me to bothing taking a second look. I disagree even though it is in the Starcraft style, I would argue that Dawn of War and C&C 3 have far more thought out and well done graphics, and with DOW on the verge of releasing the expansion to add the Tyranids (the race the zerg are loosely based off of) which happen to be based off if I recall alien, I think that it should be thrown into the match. As of current it and C&C3 hold the market where it is and set point as the flag bearers, it would require they be knocked out of their seats before I see Starcraft II as a true addition to the franchise, and not just a cheap buck.
|
|
#e61919
Product Manager
12218
0
1
Mar 11, 2017 17:47:30 GMT -8
Matej
This is my status!
17,630
August 2003
wooper
|
Post by Matej on May 27, 2007 2:35:15 GMT -8
One word: Weak Sure, the promotional videos and pictures look great. However, the gameplay videos look boring and cliche. It brings absolutely nothing to the genre. Granted, it does look better than other games of its genre, but not good enough for me to bothing taking a second look. I disagree even though it is in the Starcraft style, I would argue that Dawn of War and C&C 3 have far more thought out and well done graphics, and with DOW on the verge of releasing the expansion to add the Tyranids (the race the zerg are loosely based off of) which happen to be based off if I recall alien, I think that it should be thrown into the match. As of current it and C&C3 hold the market where it is and set point as the flag bearers, it would require they be knocked out of their seats before I see Starcraft II as a true addition to the franchise, and not just a cheap buck. Screw graphics, give gameplay. While I do occasionally play C&C3 as well, I believe Starcraft will bring some difference to it. SC (by judging from the original ofcourse ) has the most balanced races, each has its weak spot against another and is better against some other unit. No unit is undefeatable (e.g. Mammoth tank), while the gameplay of each of the races is completely different (e.g. a player that only played terran, might not even know how to build as a Protoss, or summon new units as Zerg). I honestly dont care about how good the graphics are. For all I care, give SC2 with the old isometric graphics! Just give me the fun the game gave me (and that was when C&C was also roaming the strategy fields). I really dont understand why people look at the graphics of the game first. Would you play pac-man if it was in true-reallife 3D, but exactly the same gameplay?
|
|