inherit
147662
0
Jun 25, 2017 18:27:28 GMT -8
Ara (Crow)
7,197
September 2009
919shiner919
|
Post by Ara (Crow) on Jul 10, 2010 17:55:41 GMT -8
When your working on a graphic do you stock, or just use whatever works?
I'm the kind to use stock, and follow all the rules, just to be more safe when putting stuff on my sites. Though it usually means going through hours of manipulating to get what I wanted.
Do you actually use stock is the question.
|
|
Kami
Forum Cat
Posts: 40,201
Mini-Profile Theme: Kami's Mini-Profile
#f35f71
156500
0
Offline
Jul 24, 2021 11:48:29 GMT -8
Kami
40,201
July 2010
kamiyakaoru
Kami's Mini-Profile
|
Post by Kami on Jul 10, 2010 21:48:59 GMT -8
It depends entirely on what i'm doing. and what do you mean by stock, anyway? like an actual stock photo? i see a lot of new designers referring to renders/transparent .png's as 'stock', so i'm just curious. stock images are nice for certain tags or lp's, but for other tags or projects, a render is better, or better to just pentool the whole thing.
edit1;; or brushes / typography. you can make some amazing things using nothing but brushes, fonts, and colouration techniques.
edit2;; moving to GDD.
|
|
inherit
Rwy'n hoffi coffi
49511
0
Mar 4, 2021 21:41:56 GMT -8
Anselm
boom
12,182
July 2005
transfermktforum
|
Post by Anselm on Jul 11, 2010 0:47:03 GMT -8
Assuming you mean stock photos, I'll use them for things like sigs, but web layouts only for example content really (or real content )
|
|
inherit
fishgomoo
85493
0
Nov 19, 2012 13:59:58 GMT -8
dude
cows go glug
2,539
July 2006
dudelicious
|
Post by dude on Jul 11, 2010 6:15:03 GMT -8
Will always use stocks in tags rather than renders - the background of an image is just as useful as the character itself and is a much better starting point than blank white. Also often use stocks for background textures and stuff in web design or as anselm said for content.
|
|