c4ds and big text.

[captain awesome]

yes?

[ircrazyd]

Text is to big. Lighting seems off as well. b/w ftw.

[Anselm]

Yeah, I'm liking this.

The lighting has been done well, and there's a definite flow here. The stock has been well blended in and the C4D has also been well used.

The text is large, that's granted, but I like the lighting on it. It gives a different abstract approach. Liking it there.

Good job

[captain awesome]

here it is without text-



and thanks both

[Anselm]

You're welcome.

With, without text, I think I don't mind either way.

[Smangii]

w/o Text is a lot better Lighting could still be a bit stronger, and the flow from the stock to the sig just looks feathered =/ Unless it's supposed to. B/W does look nice in this, and the c4ds used are funky =D

[captain awesome]

pff i did no feathering.

and thankss :]

i'll tr yand play around with the lighting.

[Smangii]

equad said:

pff i did no feathering.

and thankss :]

i'll tr yand play around with the lighting.

Ok, maybe not FEATHERING but it looks a bit TOO faded You get me XD You're welcome.

[captain awesome]

played with it abit.





:3

[`?v?`]

I like it but the text shouldn't be over the guy. The background looks great. And I like the font but it needs to be off to the side

[jongos]

Vey sexy.

The first is by far the best. For once I like the b/w

[jeffrey]

Nice..
I think the lighting is good...
I'm not sure I know what the text says, though....
Very nice.

[dude]

The c4d on the right hand side kills it a bit for me cos the edges are too sharp. Flows pretty decent but the lighting is in the wrong place (I mean the lighting at the bottom) and the stock looks a bit too blurred out to me - thing the lighting is what has done it. Looks much better without the text and overall it's a pretty good sig.