inherit
15021
0
Apr 14, 2018 19:45:16 GMT -8
Lainey
2,322
October 2003
amethystlainey
|
Post by Lainey on May 5, 2012 9:38:25 GMT -8
I just have a question about large images getting a scrollbar instead of breaking the forum. What if we have in place now the image resize. I would rather keep using the image resize then get a scrollbar that is gonna break the image
|
|
inherit
16846
0
Nov 19, 2012 15:20:20 GMT -8
Chris
3,036
December 2003
cddude
|
Post by Chris on May 5, 2012 10:22:39 GMT -8
I just have a question about large images getting a scrollbar instead of breaking the forum. What if we have in place now the image resize. I would rather keep using the image resize then get a scrollbar that is gonna break the image Codes will be able to handle it just like now.
|
|
inherit
Graphics Ninja
3
0
Nov 19, 2012 12:17:26 GMT -8
Ryan Roos
Wordsmyth
35,133
November 2003
ryan
|
Post by Ryan Roos on May 5, 2012 13:04:39 GMT -8
The eternal debate. It seems like whichever way we do this we're just going to have a million requests the other way. No one is happy with whichever way we do it. Though everyone agrees that we don't want it to be like v4 and have large images breaking the forum width. We will have another meeting about this on Monday . At this point I'm really tired of this request which comes up about twice a month. So I'm going to propose we just set an option in the admin panel and let the admin of the forum decide how over-sized images work. Want a scroll bar, you get a scroll bar (downside is you cant see the whole image at once). Want the image re-sized, you get the image re-sized (downside is the image quality is severely degraded by the browser). [rant] I personally come from the scroll bar side of the war, if you post a giant image you obviously care about the detail of it otherwise you wouldn't post a giant image. If you wanted it smaller you would have re-sized it before uploading/linking it. If you come from the re-size side of the war then why would you post large images to begin with? I just don't get it. If you don't expect people to see a big image then don't post a big image. Maybe I'm just crazy. [/rant]
|
|
inherit
15021
0
Apr 14, 2018 19:45:16 GMT -8
Lainey
2,322
October 2003
amethystlainey
|
Post by Lainey on May 5, 2012 18:20:43 GMT -8
Its not the admin or staff only , We cant control adverts and such so yea. I was just curious. I love something like the resize code we have now as it seems to work well.
|
|
inherit
Jack of All Trades, Master of None
27090
0
May 30, 2013 20:36:34 GMT -8
Stinky666
8,818
July 2004
stinky666
|
Post by Stinky666 on May 5, 2012 18:46:23 GMT -8
The eternal debate. It seems like whichever way we do this we're just going to have a million requests the other way. No one is happy with whichever way we do it. Though everyone agrees that we don't want it to be like v4 and have large images breaking the forum width. We will have another meeting about this on Monday . At this point I'm really tired of this request which comes up about twice a month. So I'm going to propose we just set an option in the admin panel and let the admin of the forum decide how over-sized images work. Want a scroll bar, you get a scroll bar (downside is you cant see the whole image at once). Want the image re-sized, you get the image re-sized (downside is the image quality is severely degraded by the browser). [rant] I personally come from the scroll bar side of the war, if you post a giant image you obviously care about the detail of it otherwise you wouldn't post a giant image. If you wanted it smaller you would have re-sized it before uploading it. If you come from the re-size side of the war then why would you post large images to begin with? I just don't get it. If you don't expect people to see a big image then don't post a big image. Maybe I'm just crazy. [/rant] Personally I prefer an image resize that you click on, and it opens the image in a new tab. That for me, would be ideal. So if you have that as one of those 2 options for the admins to choose from, that'd be fantastic.
|
|
inherit
Graphics Ninja
3
0
Nov 19, 2012 12:17:26 GMT -8
Ryan Roos
Wordsmyth
35,133
November 2003
ryan
|
Post by Ryan Roos on May 5, 2012 18:53:30 GMT -8
Personally I prefer an image resize that you click on, and it opens the image in a new tab. That for me, would be ideal. So if you have that as one of those 2 options for the admins to choose from, that'd be fantastic. Attachments are different than embedded images. Attachments do open a new tab and they have a thumbnail. We're talking about images with the img tag in this thread.
|
|
inherit
15021
0
Apr 14, 2018 19:45:16 GMT -8
Lainey
2,322
October 2003
amethystlainey
|
Post by Lainey on May 5, 2012 19:04:22 GMT -8
Ryan stinky is talking about the images I think. There is a current code where u click it to see the full image also it tells u how much it was reduced. Im using on both my forums right now.
|
|
inherit
Jack of All Trades, Master of None
27090
0
May 30, 2013 20:36:34 GMT -8
Stinky666
8,818
July 2004
stinky666
|
Post by Stinky666 on May 5, 2012 22:33:00 GMT -8
Personally I prefer an image resize that you click on, and it opens the image in a new tab. That for me, would be ideal. So if you have that as one of those 2 options for the admins to choose from, that'd be fantastic. Attachments are different than embedded images. Attachments do open a new tab and they have a thumbnail. We're talking about images with the img tag in this thread. Just to clarify, I was talking about exactly what AmethystLainey said: img tags.
|
|
inherit
Graphics Ninja
3
0
Nov 19, 2012 12:17:26 GMT -8
Ryan Roos
Wordsmyth
35,133
November 2003
ryan
|
Post by Ryan Roos on May 6, 2012 12:18:07 GMT -8
Okay so if we were to implement the choice between scroll bars and re-sized images would you guys prefer the the re-sized images work like attachment thumbnails then?
1) The image is re-sized to fit, and is a link that opens a new tab at the image's source, displaying the full size image. OR 2) Would you prefer that it just be re-sized and isn't a link to avoid misclicks.
|
|
inherit
15021
0
Apr 14, 2018 19:45:16 GMT -8
Lainey
2,322
October 2003
amethystlainey
|
Post by Lainey on May 6, 2012 12:23:58 GMT -8
I like how the resize is handled using the current code
|
|
inherit
Graphics Ninja
3
0
Nov 19, 2012 12:17:26 GMT -8
Ryan Roos
Wordsmyth
35,133
November 2003
ryan
|
Post by Ryan Roos on May 6, 2012 12:28:25 GMT -8
I like how the resize is handled using the current code Sooooo... that would be option 1 then?
|
|
inherit
15021
0
Apr 14, 2018 19:45:16 GMT -8
Lainey
2,322
October 2003
amethystlainey
|
Post by Lainey on May 6, 2012 12:30:10 GMT -8
Yes Ryan. gl with all this
|
|
inherit
Jack of All Trades, Master of None
27090
0
May 30, 2013 20:36:34 GMT -8
Stinky666
8,818
July 2004
stinky666
|
Post by Stinky666 on May 6, 2012 16:02:59 GMT -8
As previously mentioned, I personally, would prefer to be able to click on the image that has been re-sized and it open in a new tab.
|
|
inherit
88478
0
Nov 24, 2024 17:48:25 GMT -8
Robyn
22,565
September 2006
millsberryfanrob
|
Post by Robyn on May 7, 2012 3:18:22 GMT -8
I'd vote 1 as well.
|
|
inherit
170346
0
Mar 1, 2016 12:53:37 GMT -8
Shorty
Yeah, I'm that cool. Lol! No I'm not.
3,018
August 2011
shortyverrett94
|
Post by Shorty on May 7, 2012 10:39:36 GMT -8
I like the image resize too.
|
|