inherit
165908
0
Aug 12, 2020 19:54:47 GMT -8
mmhmm
The only people who don't make mistakes are those who aren't doing anything.
5,506
April 2011
mmhmm
|
Post by mmhmm on Apr 16, 2014 8:10:16 GMT -8
I see nothing wrong with having the ability to send multiple members the same PM message. I've only addressed it because it was used as a justification for giving up the ability to see that a single PM had been received. I don't understand the technical issues associated with this, but why does it have to be an either/or situation? Wouldn't it be of some benefit to know if nine of ten identical PMs sent to different members were never read? It wouldn't be of benefit to me. I sent the PMs. It's not my responsibility to read them and it's not my business to know if others choose to read them, or not. If what I sent in the PM is important and someone didn't read it and ends up in error because they didn't read it, that is an issue that needs attention. I don't need to micromanage prior to the issue. |
|
inherit
169146
0
Apr 7, 2024 5:23:13 GMT -8
Forever Sunshine
Fingerprints don't fade from the lives we touch. Great love & great achievement involve great risk.
1,743
July 2011
foreversunshine
|
Post by Forever Sunshine on Apr 16, 2014 8:11:29 GMT -8
The discussion is moot. The feature is not going to be added back in anytime in the future. Sorry! So lock the thread. |
|
inherit
165908
0
Aug 12, 2020 19:54:47 GMT -8
mmhmm
The only people who don't make mistakes are those who aren't doing anything.
5,506
April 2011
mmhmm
|
Post by mmhmm on Apr 16, 2014 8:13:10 GMT -8
I'm sure if Michael chooses to lock the thread, he'll do so. He's the Admin here.
|
|
inherit
169146
0
Apr 7, 2024 5:23:13 GMT -8
Forever Sunshine
Fingerprints don't fade from the lives we touch. Great love & great achievement involve great risk.
1,743
July 2011
foreversunshine
|
Post by Forever Sunshine on Apr 16, 2014 8:14:25 GMT -8
Of course he is, mmhmm. I think the red name gave that away! Didn't need to be told that but thanks!
|
|
#e61919
Support Manager
154778
0
1
Nov 27, 2024 12:17:07 GMT -8
Michael
19,618
May 2010
wiseowl
|
Post by Michael on Apr 16, 2014 8:37:49 GMT -8
I only lock threads when the discussion isn't proving to be civil. There is still discussion going on here that is civil and I'm not about to just shut it down just because the discussion is moot. I'll do what I think is best without being told what to do, thanks. That being said it looks like things have turned. Thanks for participating everyone!
|
|
