richndanapoint
inherit
-745137
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:08:06 GMT -8
richndanapoint
0
January 1970
GUEST
|
Post by richndanapoint on Jun 21, 2005 20:21:07 GMT -8
I’ll be happy if I get just one response Nonlocality, nonlinearity and Godel Universes suggest a radical departure from our traditional understanding of time - that it is fundamentally nonexistent. If this is so, many questions arise. To begin: 1) Have we erroneously assumed time is a fundamental truth? 2) What other assumptions might our belief systems rest upon? 3) How can we become aware of our assumptions to critically analyze them? 4) Without time, free will can't exist. Can it if time does exist? Might that be another of our assumptions? 5) Without free will, what can be made of the legal system? 6) Without time, what explanation might there be for experience? 7) Without time, infinity can't be. It requires some sort of growth process in time. What explanation might there be for our ability to conceive of infinite sets?
|
|
inherit
Banned
39031
0
May 31, 2007 9:56:53 GMT -8
ryndell
1,808
March 2005
ryndell
|
Post by ryndell on Jun 21, 2005 20:23:00 GMT -8
Time itself is unending ... it is one of the constents in the universe.it is unchanging ... and unwavering ... Its Man Perception of time, that is a uniquely human form of awareness.
|
|
inherit
15250
0
Jul 11, 2024 2:25:53 GMT -8
Isaac
7,686
October 2003
mod
|
Post by Isaac on Jun 21, 2005 20:30:10 GMT -8
My clock says 12:33. Now 12:34 Voila! We have time.
|
|
richndanapoint
inherit
-745140
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:08:06 GMT -8
richndanapoint
0
January 1970
GUEST
|
Post by richndanapoint on Jun 21, 2005 20:36:32 GMT -8
My clock says 12:33. Now 12:34 Voila! We have time. I can't imagine an ability to conceive of infinity without an innate sense of time. My friends and I used to debate, and discuss pre-destination vs. free will. My personal theory is pre-destination by logical sequence. Essentially that's; when you make a decision, it's the only possible one, based on your knowledge, intellect, and experience, and whatever circumstances, are prevalent.
|
|
inherit
Banned
39031
0
May 31, 2007 9:56:53 GMT -8
ryndell
1,808
March 2005
ryndell
|
Post by ryndell on Jun 21, 2005 20:39:20 GMT -8
Put it this way ... rather man was here to see it or not ... if man was never here to even measure it ..It would infact ... no if and or buts.Take the same time for the either to revolve on its axis once .. called the 24 hour period as we percieve it,but it still would take the same measurement of time .Just like if a tree falls in the woods no one is around . to hear it.does it make a sound .Yes it does .
|
|
inherit
Empress of Scifi and Fantasy Mass Hugglecide
32778
EnchantedPiffy enchantedpiffy
0
Sept 24, 2008 13:53:44 GMT -8
Enchant
I put a spell on you!Now your mine. Resistance is Futile!BEWARE OF THE ORI
17,931
November 2004
enchant
|
Post by Enchant on Jun 21, 2005 20:43:25 GMT -8
time exist reguardless of perception, its the one truth that all things are based
|
|
inherit
32179
0
Aug 18, 2020 23:28:29 GMT -8
Cameron Stone
11 Year member
3,843
October 2004
mr666
|
Post by Cameron Stone on Jun 21, 2005 20:44:17 GMT -8
This stuff is way over my head. I am getting a headache.
|
|
Former Member
inherit
guest@proboards.com
70103
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:08:06 GMT -8
Former Member
0
January 1970
Former Member
|
Post by Former Member on Jun 21, 2005 20:59:27 GMT -8
Time is a measurement we invented to give us a boundry, a beginning and an end. It removes alot of confusion that we may otherwise have. Time is relative rather then a substance, it's existence isn't fundamental to ours.
|
|
inherit
17836
0
Nov 18, 2024 10:00:51 GMT -8
daniel
27,203
December 2003
danielsmith
|
Post by daniel on Jun 21, 2005 21:06:14 GMT -8
From dictionary.com:
We live in a world/universe where things just 'are', where existence is a constant state, yet various aspects of that existence are in perpetual change. Time is a mental contruct to describe elements shifting from one form to another under the labels of past, present, future. Our minds carry information regarding these changes, so time is used as a categorization method to keep things in an order to better understand our existence and its continual shifts. I believe any entity with the ability to form coherent memories would also develop a system which we refer to as time.
Oh, the other question- I don't believe in predestination or predetermination. Each individual at each moment has the opportunity to change various aspects of existence which he or she touches. To me, predetermination suggests higher intelligence, and if a higher intelligence steered the course, even in very subtle ways, shouldn't that course make logical sense? Humanity is too random, too self deprecating, self injuring to work off of predetermination. If each person made the best decision for him/herself given the available information, then predetermination would make sense. As it is, too many people make stupid decisions fully aware of likely negative consequences to make Scient predetermination likely.
|
|
inherit
Empress of Scifi and Fantasy Mass Hugglecide
32778
EnchantedPiffy enchantedpiffy
0
Sept 24, 2008 13:53:44 GMT -8
Enchant
I put a spell on you!Now your mine. Resistance is Futile!BEWARE OF THE ORI
17,931
November 2004
enchant
|
Post by Enchant on Jun 21, 2005 21:10:49 GMT -8
From dictionary.com: We live in a world/universe where things just 'are', where existence is a constant state, yet various aspects of that existence are in perpetual change. Time is a mental contruct to describe elements shifting from one form to another under the labels of past, present, future. Our minds carry information regarding these changes, so time is used as a categorization method to keep things in an order to better understand our existence and its continual shifts. I believe any entity with the ability to form coherent memories would also develop a system which we refer to as time. Oh, the other question- I don't believe in predestination or predetermination. Each individual at each moment has the opportunity to change various aspects of existence which he or she touches. To me, predetermination suggests higher intelligence, and if a higher intelligence steered the course, even in very subtle ways, shouldn't that course make logical sense? Humanity is too random, too self deprecating, self injuring to work off of predetermination. If each person made the best decision for him/herself given the available information, then predetermination would make sense. As it is, too many people make stupid decisions fully aware of likely negative consequences to make Scient predetermination likely. Okay...I have to say it that response was very sexy... LMAO dont tell my husband ....but it was very nicely said
|
|
myke
inherit
-745147
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:08:06 GMT -8
myke
0
January 1970
GUEST
|
Post by myke on Jun 21, 2005 21:34:14 GMT -8
Time is not something we created to measure a series of events. We simply created a tool in which to measure time is all. Time is not an illusion, or a sequencing of coherent memories.
If that was the case, then Einsteins Theory of Relativity becomes nothing more then the ramblings of a mad man. As we accelerate to speeds nearing the speed of light, time slows for the person and/or object moving. What would be an hour for me at those high speeds, may be 25 years to you. So, while I return a little more hungry then I was when I left, an hour older, you have aged 25 years and have eaten thousands of meals.
This is basically a proven theory as well, so if time is nothing more then a human invention to measure linear events, then how can this be possible?
|
|
inherit
28851
0
Jul 17, 2010 11:57:38 GMT -8
Hyleus
1,606
August 2004
hyleus
|
Post by Hyleus on Jun 21, 2005 21:54:36 GMT -8
Time is not something we created to measure a series of events. We simply created a tool in which to measure time is all. Time is not an illusion, or a sequencing of coherent memories. If that was the case, then Einsteins Theory of Relativity becomes nothing more then the ramblings of a mad man. As we accelerate to speeds nearing the speed of light, time slows for the person and/or object moving. What would be an hour for me at those high speeds, may be 25 years to you. So, while I return a little more hungry then I was when I left, an hour older, you have aged 25 years and have eaten thousands of meals. This is basically a proven theory as well, so if time is nothing more then a human invention to measure linear events, then how can this be possible? That is well put, you said everything I was going to say and alot more. -.^
|
|
myke
inherit
-745149
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:08:06 GMT -8
myke
0
January 1970
GUEST
|
Post by myke on Jun 21, 2005 22:00:25 GMT -8
Time is not something we created to measure a series of events. We simply created a tool in which to measure time is all. Time is not an illusion, or a sequencing of coherent memories. If that was the case, then Einsteins Theory of Relativity becomes nothing more then the ramblings of a mad man. As we accelerate to speeds nearing the speed of light, time slows for the person and/or object moving. What would be an hour for me at those high speeds, may be 25 years to you. So, while I return a little more hungry then I was when I left, an hour older, you have aged 25 years and have eaten thousands of meals. This is basically a proven theory as well, so if time is nothing more then a human invention to measure linear events, then how can this be possible? That is well put, you said everything I was going to say and alot more. -.^ Thank you.
|
|
inherit
28851
0
Jul 17, 2010 11:57:38 GMT -8
Hyleus
1,606
August 2004
hyleus
|
Post by Hyleus on Jun 21, 2005 22:02:32 GMT -8
That is well put, you said everything I was going to say and alot more. -.^ Thank you. Welcomeness to the extreme! I like how you put it as how we made tools to measure it though, that explained alot. -.^
|
|
inherit
28486
0
Nov 27, 2024 17:30:20 GMT -8
Artemis
20,790
August 2004
lray2
|
Post by Artemis on Jun 21, 2005 22:06:29 GMT -8
When I think about it it makes my head hurt... I have questions like, "if time if indefinite, when did it START?" because there is a beginning to all things right? There HAS to be a start, or it can't be going at all.
|
|